<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Email Encryption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/</link>
	<description>Answers, Alternatives, Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:08:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Good pair of articles. I use encryption for many mails, but only to a few other people keen enough to go through the hassle you describe. For me the biggest issue is Outlook. I was using Thunderbird for ages, and its Enigmail plugin as, as you say, very easy to use (although generating the key pair in the first place isn&#039;t something I&#039;d ask my grandmother to try). But Outlook&#039;s PGP support is, surprisingly, sparse. Previously I&#039;d used gpg4win, but at time of writing it has been impossible to get a clean download of the any of the available versions. I ended up using a commercial tool (PGP Desktop) for the first time (although I did manage to get it to accept my existing keys which I&#039;d generated using Puttygen.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good pair of articles. I use encryption for many mails, but only to a few other people keen enough to go through the hassle you describe. For me the biggest issue is Outlook. I was using Thunderbird for ages, and its Enigmail plugin as, as you say, very easy to use (although generating the key pair in the first place isn&#8217;t something I&#8217;d ask my grandmother to try). But Outlook&#8217;s PGP support is, surprisingly, sparse. Previously I&#8217;d used gpg4win, but at time of writing it has been impossible to get a clean download of the any of the available versions. I ended up using a commercial tool (PGP Desktop) for the first time (although I did manage to get it to accept my existing keys which I&#8217;d generated using Puttygen.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Eno</title>
		<link>http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Eno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using MessageLock, which uses zip file encryption to protect email. Its the easiest thing I&#039;ve found to send those &quot;one off&quot; secure emails, or to regularly secure a few addresses. Cheap and easy, something PGP is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using MessageLock, which uses zip file encryption to protect email. Its the easiest thing I&#8217;ve found to send those &#8220;one off&#8221; secure emails, or to regularly secure a few addresses. Cheap and easy, something PGP is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 17:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Isaac,

You are right. It is cumbersome. PGP using free tools is pretty involved using anything but Thunderbird and Enigmail in my experience, and even s/mime using Outlook changes the user experience.

The real problem is that someone else reading your mail is an invisible threat. It&#039;s harmless in terms of direct consequences for most people - unless perhaps you&#039;re sending child porn or something - so they don&#039;t think it&#039;s &quot;necessary&quot;.

I believe that it can be made to be simple, but it&#039;s going to take buy in.

In any case, the evidence of non-use is clear - the two companies I&#039;ve contacted about setting up PKI, Thawte.com and Verisign.com don&#039;t seem very responsive.

SSL certs seem to get much more attention.

However, one company I work with has requested that all comms with them be encrypted. I&#039;ve requested it of others. We&#039;ll see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isaac,</p>
<p>You are right. It is cumbersome. PGP using free tools is pretty involved using anything but Thunderbird and Enigmail in my experience, and even s/mime using Outlook changes the user experience.</p>
<p>The real problem is that someone else reading your mail is an invisible threat. It&#8217;s harmless in terms of direct consequences for most people &#8211; unless perhaps you&#8217;re sending child porn or something &#8211; so they don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s &#8220;necessary&#8221;.</p>
<p>I believe that it can be made to be simple, but it&#8217;s going to take buy in.</p>
<p>In any case, the evidence of non-use is clear &#8211; the two companies I&#8217;ve contacted about setting up PKI, Thawte.com and Verisign.com don&#8217;t seem very responsive.</p>
<p>SSL certs seem to get much more attention.</p>
<p>However, one company I work with has requested that all comms with them be encrypted. I&#8217;ve requested it of others. We&#8217;ll see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 17:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Great collection of writings on Secure Email.  I&#039;ve recently been taken to task by many people claiming that I falsely represented the complexity of using secure email.  The fact of the matter is that it IS cumbersome and complicated for the &quot;average business user&quot; to use Secure Email protocols.

I&#039;m not an email or encryption expert, but I can speak from experience that I am an advanced technology user (power user by any comparison) and I&#039;ve never run into anyone else using digital signatures in email, etc (even in the Enterprise companies I&#039;ve worked at in the past).

Let me be clear....so that I don&#039;t get flamed on this blog as well......I&#039;m not stating that Secure Email is &#039;stupid&#039; or that it doesn&#039;t exist...I&#039;m simply stating a very real fact that very few people use it (outside of government agencies, enterprise companies and Closed Notes/Domino Environments).

The very fact that it took you several posts to describe the ins and outs of your secure email experience is testimony enough that its NOT for the &quot;average business person&quot; yet.

Its sad and unfortunate, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great collection of writings on Secure Email.  I&#8217;ve recently been taken to task by many people claiming that I falsely represented the complexity of using secure email.  The fact of the matter is that it IS cumbersome and complicated for the &#8220;average business user&#8221; to use Secure Email protocols.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an email or encryption expert, but I can speak from experience that I am an advanced technology user (power user by any comparison) and I&#8217;ve never run into anyone else using digital signatures in email, etc (even in the Enterprise companies I&#8217;ve worked at in the past).</p>
<p>Let me be clear&#8230;.so that I don&#8217;t get flamed on this blog as well&#8230;&#8230;I&#8217;m not stating that Secure Email is &#8216;stupid&#8217; or that it doesn&#8217;t exist&#8230;I&#8217;m simply stating a very real fact that very few people use it (outside of government agencies, enterprise companies and Closed Notes/Domino Environments).</p>
<p>The very fact that it took you several posts to describe the ins and outs of your secure email experience is testimony enough that its NOT for the &#8220;average business person&#8221; yet.</p>
<p>Its sad and unfortunate, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Visit To Lornitropia &#187; Encryption: OpenPGP vs Digital ID</title>
		<link>http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>A Visit To Lornitropia &#187; Encryption: OpenPGP vs Digital ID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swduncan.com/archives/2006/05/04/more-on-email-encryption/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: Since writing the article below I&#8217;ve found that many things I wrote were incorrect. I have corrected them here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: Since writing the article below I&#8217;ve found that many things I wrote were incorrect. I have corrected them here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

